About Me

Name: Contrarian Guitarist
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

I think I'll take the rest of the year off...

...and lay off my employees, until next year. Because if I make over $250,000 I'll have to pay 12.4% more in taxes. That's both shares of the payroll taxes, the responsibility of one who is self-employed. That is if BHO gets his way. That's a 38% tax increase for everyone making over 250K!!! What will they get for that? $1200 a month after age 67? Please! Anyone making that kind of money during their career won't qualify for social security anyway because they were probably smart and set up a KEOUGH, an IRA, a SEP-IRA, a Roth-IRA and other personal saving vehicles.

Bring families together again... get rid of social security! Then Grampa can't say "I don't need to be nice to my kids I've got social security"anymore.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dude, here's my job!

The May '08 unemployment numbers though large were heavily skewed by new job seekers. Not technically un-employed more like not-yet-employed. From this article...
"The number of unemployed increased by 861,000 in May, the third-largest monthly increase since the US Labor Department started collecting figures in 1948 and more than 60% was accounted for by new entrants and those re-entering the workforce, with the bulk of the new workers in the 16 to 24 bracket."
Probably will see it downwardly revised in the coming weeks and relatively unreported. And will drift down more in the late Summer early Fall.

Remember unemployment was 7.5% in May of 1980 and stayed there until around the Winter of '81. Inflation was around 12% during that same time. Prime interest rate peaked at 21.5% later in 1982. Loved my money market fund then.
Tags: economy   jobs  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bride of More On Oil

Something on oil/dollar relationship from this article.

Key sentence...
"...because the inverse price relationship between oil and the dollar has been proven fundamentally reliable, traders and investors with negative exposure to the steep fall in the dollar over the past three years have been increasingly using oil futures contracts as their hedge instrument of choice."


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inflate Your Porfolio

Read about Inflation-proof Investing here. I still wonder how much of commodities inflation is due to investors not end users. Time will tell.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anticipating Governmental Attacks

With much fear and loathing I opened my annual package from Blue Shield. Usually contains a thick booklet of policy changes and a new fee (read: new higher fee) structure. Well the policy changes were there, but something was missing. Like rechecking a winning lottery ticket over and over (something that I understand requires the purchase of a lottery ticket) I literally reread my statement three times before I dared to believe my sizable family premium had been cut by 10%!!! No I hadn't gotten younger (though Mrs. Contrarian Guitarist looks younger than ever), we hadn't lost a kid, nothing had changed just our premium. I wasn't the only one, millions of Californians experienced the same thing.

What happened? Had costs gone down? Probably not. What happened is twofold. Blue Shield is non-profit, meaning it can't, ultimately make a profit. It can build assets to a point to cover future costs. But at some point if it is paying out less than it is taking in then it's either going to have to give rebates, cut premiums or even give a premium holiday. The second possible reason for the cut is to inspire a fuzzier, warmer feeling towards insurers and the candidates they prefer come November. Those would be candidates that are opposed to a single payer nationalized health care system.

I planned on voting for them anyway. But the extra jingle in my pocket is cool too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on oil.

Shawn Tully makes a good point here. Actually he makes my point.
Tags: oil   economy  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OIL is driving oil.

The index ETN - OIL, is at least partly responsible for irrational run-up of oil prices. An ETF is an Exchange Traded Note. What is OIL? This is the description from it's Yahoo Profile page...
"The investment is linked to the performance of the Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Return Index as reflects the returns that are potentially available through an unleveraged investment in the futures contracts comprising the index plus the Treasury Bill rate of interest that could be earned on funds committed to the trading of the underlying contracts. The index is derived from the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The fund is not diversified."
OK, I challenge anyone investing in OIL to restate that paragraph back to me in a manner to prove you understand what you are getting into. It's never been easier to invest in oil futures, everyone's doing it, everyone's getting rich! Well not so fast. Get ready for the next crash. The Crash of 1987 was largely caused by program selling of large lots of stocks. Who owned all these shares? Investors? Nope. Mutual funds. An investment vehicle that exploded in the 1980's ($48 billion in assets in the late 1960's - to $12.358 TRILLION in 2007). Computers executing programed selling went into a free fall. Since the system has installed "circuit breakers" of sorts. I'm not aware of any such safeguards for commodities investors. So, um, look out.

Other funds like USO, an ETF, that invests in futures contracts is also very likely to have an affect on oil prices. The inception date? April 10th, 2006. Check out it's chart here. Only up. When did gas prices start going up again. Hmmm. Average volume? Almost 10 million shares a day, times a price of over $100 and that's a billion dollars every day being traded in this fund.

Find out who's buying and selling OIL and USO. Is it individuals like you and me or institutional investors?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dude, where's my job?

After watching this generalizing report on 60 Minutes a few months ago, I said to Mrs. Contrarian Guitarist, "What we need is higher unemployment, then the millennials will appreciate their jobs." Well 5.5 is a start.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ishmael vs. Isaac

If John McCain chooses Joe Lieberman as his running mate, it would set up an historic contest between a descendant of Ishmael and a descendant of Isaac. Tracing it's roots from the book of Genesis to the conflict today concerning Israel and Jerusalem.

Joe could help deliver Connecticut's 7 electoral votes (Kerry could've had Ohio, and if Bush won CT he still would've won the presidency). And maybe help deliver some of the double voters in Florida and New York to the Republican ticket for a change.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inflation vs. Deflation

I recently was reminded of a gag David Letterman did on his show back in his NBC days, that of an actual face-to-face duel between a humidifier and a de-humidifier. Clever bit. I'm afraid I can't recall which won.

OK. I believe we will see some softening of commodity prices. Oil, precious metals, grains, pork bellies (whatever those are). I agree with George Soros (first time for everything) that we are experiencing a commodities bubble. Bubbles burst.

It seems though in the meantime that everything is up. The cost of living is way up. Right? Or is it? What are most households largest expense? Their monthly rent/mortgage payment. A lot of emphasis has been placed on homeowners in trouble, what about renters who are going to buy in this buyers market. But houses are cheaper this year than they were last year. About 14%. If you can get into a $300,000 house at a 14% discount, you are saving around 42,000 smackeroos. That'll buy a lot of gas, gold, milk, eggs, tortillas, wood for the deck, metal for the shed, and still have some left over for the kids college education. Some areas have seen a much greater drop in prices, in other words "deflation". We are in a the midst of inflation-deflation duel.

Factor into that much lower interest rates (heck the Fed rate is down 60% in a year) and the savings is much greater!

If you add new home sales of about 1.2 million to existing home sales of about 6.1 million, that's 7.3 million projected in the next 12 months. What percentage of those are first time buyers? Don't know.

I imagine if we ran the numbers, over all, spread out over everyone, costs are down. This is why we don't have a technical recession. Banking turmoil rarely results in recession. Not in my lifetime anyway.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Expect this for the next five months...

... MSM stories on racism. Designed to guilt voters.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq or no Iraq?

That is the question.

Or one of the top five questions of this election cycle. One that has a clear choice. A vote for Obama means withdrawal whether feasible or not. A vote for McCain means staying in Iraq. Maybe for the long haul. Meaning military/air bases in Iraq for a while.

How long?

Well, we are still in Japan, Germany and South Korea. All three countries have experienced peace since we "set up camp". In fact the regions have been peaceful. Would a peaceful Middle East be a good thing?

Obama equates his sitting down with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with Kennedy's pow-wow with Nikita Khrushchev. OK, let's take Obama's point. He, like Kennedy (beloved ex-Pres), should sit down with our enemy. For Obama to equate himself with Kennedy is one thing (one that Dan Quayle was not allowed to do - and he was only talking about age), but Barack himself, not George Bush or Rush Limbaugh, is equating Khrushchev with Ahmadinejad. This implies that our sitch with Iran is as dire as, or nearly as dire as, was the situation between 1962 US with 1962 USSR.

The result of the Kennedy-Khrushchev rendezvous? Though the press was keep in the dark, all insiders said it didn't go well for JFK. He appeared weak. Kennedy himself exclaimed "He treated me like a little boy". Within a year we had The Berlin Wall and missiles in Cuba. So much for sitting down with one's enemies.

I think if there is parity, as in the US-USSR, then a dialog is important. Ronald Reagan met with Mikhail Gorbachev, and it led to the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the break-up of the old Soviet Union. I don't think Iran is an equal that deserves an audience with a US president. 

The situations are very different and can't really be compared, except by someone (read Obama) who thinks everyone is either too stupid to notice or too enamored to point it out.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give us your SUV's, your BLT's and your AC's

From a speech in Oregon on May 17th, 2008 BHO said...

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK."

My liberal friends would say, "yeah, so?". First Barack spends a lot more time in SUV's than I do, eats much better food than I do, and I guarantee that he spends a lot more time in air conditioned rooms than I do. This reeks of classic elitism. The party members in the USSR had all comforts that the rest of the populace were not allowed to have. So if you disagree with President Obama you'll be walking, hungry and hot/cold. Second, what do other countries have to do with what I drive and eat and my thermostat setting? I know my liberal pals would say we live in a global village and we take too much, but the truth be told (and you won't hear this in your average university), we give far more than we get. We've given away for free our secret of success for one. Built hospitals, etc. Fed the world, given money. Far more than any other country. Given ours lives for the freedom of others and only asked for enough land to bury our dead. Other countries should be saying "thanks". Oh, and they are.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

There's Oil Dot Com In Dem Dare Sub-Prime Mortgaged Hills

The same people that brought you the "dot com" boom and bust, the Gold Rush, the house flipping/sub-prime mortgage craze, etc, is now propelling oil, gold and other commodities to record highs. Note the sentence found in the middle of this article, ""This is out weighing the impact of" supply and demand, they added". In other words, investors are flocking to commodities as a "safe haven" for their money. Not really. They are trying to get rich quick. Some will. The first ones out will. Kind of like in a pyramid scam.

If you had invested in gold in 1980 and held on to it, you would have broken about even today. Well not really, you would've lost about 50% to inflation. If you had invested in Microsoft in 1980 you would have, oh never mind, I don't want to really depress you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

2 Questions.

If you were born in Hawaii before it became a state, say early August 1959, would you be able to run for president?

Does Barack Hussein Obama look 46 or 48?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive