About Me

Name: Contrarian Guitarist
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Oil Tell You Again

I made this point here, here and here. Now I could make an argument for greater regulation on oil speculation and commodity trading in general. I've shied away from investing in commodities myself. Partially for fear I'll forget I bought 2,000 bushels of wheat and it'll show up at my door. "Here's the wheat you ordered sir. Where do you want it?" Kind of thought that end users should be the only ones buying oil, etc. That could be legislated. One problem, the Law of Unintended Consequences. If the US should outlaw speculative trading of oil would other countries? Of course not. Control would escape US hands, as would trading revenue and jobs.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm Sorry, What Did She Say?

Ruth Bader Ginsburg in dissent of the Supreme Courts ruling cutting Exxon's punitive damages from 1989's Valdez oil spill actually wrote, "The new law made by the court should have been left to Congress." I'm surprised her mouth could actually form those words. She's part of the most legislative court in US history.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bride of More On Oil

Something on oil/dollar relationship from this article.

Key sentence...
"...because the inverse price relationship between oil and the dollar has been proven fundamentally reliable, traders and investors with negative exposure to the steep fall in the dollar over the past three years have been increasingly using oil futures contracts as their hedge instrument of choice."


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on oil.

Shawn Tully makes a good point here. Actually he makes my point.
Tags: oil   economy  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OIL is driving oil.

The index ETN - OIL, is at least partly responsible for irrational run-up of oil prices. An ETF is an Exchange Traded Note. What is OIL? This is the description from it's Yahoo Profile page...
"The investment is linked to the performance of the Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Return Index as reflects the returns that are potentially available through an unleveraged investment in the futures contracts comprising the index plus the Treasury Bill rate of interest that could be earned on funds committed to the trading of the underlying contracts. The index is derived from the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The fund is not diversified."
OK, I challenge anyone investing in OIL to restate that paragraph back to me in a manner to prove you understand what you are getting into. It's never been easier to invest in oil futures, everyone's doing it, everyone's getting rich! Well not so fast. Get ready for the next crash. The Crash of 1987 was largely caused by program selling of large lots of stocks. Who owned all these shares? Investors? Nope. Mutual funds. An investment vehicle that exploded in the 1980's ($48 billion in assets in the late 1960's - to $12.358 TRILLION in 2007). Computers executing programed selling went into a free fall. Since the system has installed "circuit breakers" of sorts. I'm not aware of any such safeguards for commodities investors. So, um, look out.

Other funds like USO, an ETF, that invests in futures contracts is also very likely to have an affect on oil prices. The inception date? April 10th, 2006. Check out it's chart here. Only up. When did gas prices start going up again. Hmmm. Average volume? Almost 10 million shares a day, times a price of over $100 and that's a billion dollars every day being traded in this fund.

Find out who's buying and selling OIL and USO. Is it individuals like you and me or institutional investors?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inflation vs. Deflation

I recently was reminded of a gag David Letterman did on his show back in his NBC days, that of an actual face-to-face duel between a humidifier and a de-humidifier. Clever bit. I'm afraid I can't recall which won.

OK. I believe we will see some softening of commodity prices. Oil, precious metals, grains, pork bellies (whatever those are). I agree with George Soros (first time for everything) that we are experiencing a commodities bubble. Bubbles burst.

It seems though in the meantime that everything is up. The cost of living is way up. Right? Or is it? What are most households largest expense? Their monthly rent/mortgage payment. A lot of emphasis has been placed on homeowners in trouble, what about renters who are going to buy in this buyers market. But houses are cheaper this year than they were last year. About 14%. If you can get into a $300,000 house at a 14% discount, you are saving around 42,000 smackeroos. That'll buy a lot of gas, gold, milk, eggs, tortillas, wood for the deck, metal for the shed, and still have some left over for the kids college education. Some areas have seen a much greater drop in prices, in other words "deflation". We are in a the midst of inflation-deflation duel.

Factor into that much lower interest rates (heck the Fed rate is down 60% in a year) and the savings is much greater!

If you add new home sales of about 1.2 million to existing home sales of about 6.1 million, that's 7.3 million projected in the next 12 months. What percentage of those are first time buyers? Don't know.

I imagine if we ran the numbers, over all, spread out over everyone, costs are down. This is why we don't have a technical recession. Banking turmoil rarely results in recession. Not in my lifetime anyway.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

There's Oil Dot Com In Dem Dare Sub-Prime Mortgaged Hills

The same people that brought you the "dot com" boom and bust, the Gold Rush, the house flipping/sub-prime mortgage craze, etc, is now propelling oil, gold and other commodities to record highs. Note the sentence found in the middle of this article, ""This is out weighing the impact of" supply and demand, they added". In other words, investors are flocking to commodities as a "safe haven" for their money. Not really. They are trying to get rich quick. Some will. The first ones out will. Kind of like in a pyramid scam.

If you had invested in gold in 1980 and held on to it, you would have broken about even today. Well not really, you would've lost about 50% to inflation. If you had invested in Microsoft in 1980 you would have, oh never mind, I don't want to really depress you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »